Purpose: The objective was to determine factors associated with a successful outcome at a minimum of two years after revision of a failed shoulder arthroplasty.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed over a ten year period and collected patient-reported outcome data and re-revision data. A successful outcome was defined by improvement greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Simple Shoulder Test (SST).
Results: One hundred twelve patients with average follow-up of five years were included. Improvement of VAS pain scores (6.6 ± 2.3 to 2.9 ± 2.6) and SST scores (2.7 ± 2.6 to 6.6 ± 3.3) were significant (p < 0.001). Males were more likely to have a successful outcome than females (p = 0.01).
Conclusion: Two-thirds of patients experienced clinically significant improvement at a minimum of two years after revision shoulder arthroplasty. Male sex was the strongest independent predictor of a successful outcome.
Keywords: Clinical outcomes; Revision shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder arthroplasty.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.