Scheduling doesn't matter! A noninferiority study of block versus longitudinal scheduling for emergency medicine resident pediatric procedural training experience

Maegan S Reynolds; Charmaine Lo; Junxin Shi; Jennifer Mitzman

doi:10.1002/aet2.10838

Scheduling doesn't matter! A noninferiority study of block versus longitudinal scheduling for emergency medicine resident pediatric procedural training experience

AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jan 19;7(1):e10838. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10838. eCollection 2023 Feb.

Authors

Maegan S Reynolds^{1

2}, Charmaine Lo^{1

3}, Junxin Shi^{1

3}, Jennifer Mitzman^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Division of Emergency Medicine Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.
² Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA.
³ The Abigail Wexner Research Center at Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.

Abstract

Background: Emergency medicine (EM) residencies offer a wide variety of scheduling models for pediatric patient experience, including blocked weeks in pediatric emergency departments and longitudinal models with pediatric emergency pod/department shifts integrated within other clinical experiences. Concerns with autonomy, attending entrustment, and resident comfort imply that these different scheduling models may impact EM residents' pediatric procedure volumes. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare EM residents' pediatric procedure experience and volumes between block versus longitudinal scheduling models. We hypothesize noninferiority between the scheduling models.

Methods: A retrospective review characterized the numbers and types of procedures performed by The Ohio State Emergency Medicine residents at the tertiary care pediatric hospital where residents' receive their pediatric emergency medicine clinical experience. Procedure numbers and variety were compared across six academic years: four with a block model, one reorganization year, and one integrated longitudinal year.

Results: 2552 procedures were performed by 266 resident academic years over the 6-year period. Overall, no statistically significant differences in the number of procedures performed per year or the variety of types of procedures performed per year were found when comparing the block and longitudinal models. Differences were seen in experience of PGY1 versus PGY3 residents between scheduling models and the overall experience and volumes of the PGY2 residents during the reorganization year.

Conclusions: Our study quantitatively concluded that the longitudinal scheduling model is noninferior to the more traditional block scheduling model for emergency medicine residents' pediatric emergency medicine clinical experience when reviewing volumes and types of procedures performed in a pediatric emergency department. This suggests that procedural opportunities do not need to dictate scheduling models.