Background: We reviewed our management strategy and outcome data for all 311 patients less than 18 years of age who underwent 323 heart transplants at our institution (1986 to 2022) in order to assess changes in patterns of practice and outcomes over time and to compare two consecutive eras: era 1 (154 heart transplants [1986 to 2010]) and era 2 (169 heart transplants [2011 to 2022]).
Study design: Descriptive comparisons between the two eras were performed at the level of the heart transplant for all 323 transplants. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed at the level of the patient for all 311 patients, and log-rank tests were used to compare groups.
Results: Transplants in era 2 were younger (6.6 ± 6.5 years vs 8.7 ± 6.1 years, p = 0.003). More transplants in era 2 were in infants (37.9% vs 17.5%, p < 0.0001), had congenital heart disease (53.8% vs 39.0%, p < 0.010), had high panel reactive antibody (32.1% vs 11.9%, p < 0.0001), were ABO-incompatible (11.2% vs 0.6%, p < 0.0001), had prior sternotomy (69.2% vs 39.0%, p < 0.0001), had prior Norwood (17.8% vs 0%, p < 0.0001), had prior Fontan (13.6% vs 0%, p < 0.0001), and were in patients supported with a ventricular assist device at the time of heart transplant (33.7% vs 9.1%, p < 0.0001). Survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after transplant was as follows: era 1 = 82.4% (76.5 to 88.8), 76.9% (70.4 to 84.0), 70.7% (63.7 to 78.5), and 58.8% (51.3 to 67.4), respectively; era 2 = 90.3% (85.7 to 95.1), 85.4% (79.7 to 91.5), 83.0% (76.7 to 89.8), and 66.0% (49.0 to 88.8), respectively. Overall Kaplan-Meier survival in era 2 was better (log-rank p = 0.03).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing cardiac transplantation in the most recent era are higher risk but have better survival.
Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.