Real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization among migraine patients: a German claims database analysis

J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):667-678. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2207413.

Abstract

Aims: Despite migraine being one of the most common neurological diseases, affected patients are often not effectively treated. This analysis describes the burden of migraine in Germany and assesses real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of preventive-treated migraine patients from the perspective of Statutory Health Insurance.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using InGef Research Database claims data from 2018-2019. Migraine patients were stratified into cohorts by acute and preventive treatment status. Patients on preventive treatment were further stratified according to the type of prophylaxis received. Disease burden in preventively treated migraine patients was reported via treatment patterns, pathways, and comorbidities. HCRU was assessed through outpatient provider visits, hospitalizations, and sick leave.

Results: 160,164 adult migraine patients were identified, of which 55,378 (34.6%) were prescribed preventive treatment with conventional (n = 25,984, 46.9%), calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP mAb) (n = 613, 1.1%), or off-label therapies (n = 28,781, 52.0%). 936 (1.7%) patients received Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNTA). CGRP mAb-treated patients had a high rate of triptan prescriptions (2018: 95.5%; 2019: 88.9%), migraine-related hospitalizations (2018: 33.0%; 2019: 21.0%), and sick leave (2018: 26.8%; 2019: 22.5%). A high proportion of CGRP mAb- and BoNTA-treated patients was diagnosed with abdominal and pelvic pain (34.3% and 36.2%) and low back pain (34.1% and 35.3%). These patients also showed a high prevalence of depressive episodes (49.1% and 50.1%) and chronic pain disorders (37.5% and 32.9%).

Limitations: This study focused on descriptive analyses which do not allow for assessment of causality when comparing treatment groups.

Conclusions: Disease burden was high in patients receiving CGRP mAbs suggesting that patients treated preventively with CGRP mAbs shortly after product launch in Germany were severely affected, chronic migraine patients. The same may be true for patients receiving BoNTA who also showed an increased disease burden.

Keywords: BoNTA (Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A); Headache; I10; I13; calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP); claims data; healthcare resource utilization (HCRU); migraine; treatment patterns; unmet need.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use
  • Botulinum Toxins, Type A* / therapeutic use
  • Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide / therapeutic use
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Humans
  • Migraine Disorders* / drug therapy
  • Migraine Disorders* / prevention & control
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
  • Botulinum Toxins, Type A
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal