The SITS framework: sustaining innovations in tertiary settings

Letitia Nadalin Penno; Ian D Graham; Chantal Backman; Barbara Davies; Janet Squires

doi:10.3389/frhs.2023.1102428

The SITS framework: sustaining innovations in tertiary settings

Front Health Serv. 2023 Jun 8:3:1102428. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1102428. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Letitia Nadalin Penno^{1

2}, Ian D Graham^{3

4}, Chantal Backman², Barbara Davies², Janet Squires^{2

4}

Affiliations

¹ Faculty of Environment and Health Sciences, Canadore College, North Bay, ON, Canada.
² School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
³ School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
⁴ Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Background: To date, little attention has focused on what the determinants are and how evidence-based practices (EBPs) are sustained in tertiary settings (i.e., acute care hospitals). Current literature reveals several frameworks designed for implementation of EBPs (0-2 years), yet fewer exist for the sustainment of EBPs (>2 years) in clinical practice. Frameworks containing both phases generally list few determinants for the sustained use phase, but rather state ongoing monitoring or evaluation is necessary. Notably, a recent review identified six constructs and related strategies that facilitate sustainment, however, the pairing of determinants and how best to sustain EBPs in tertiary settings over time remains unclear. The aim of this paper is to present an evidence-informed framework, which incorporates constructs, determinants, and knowledge translation interventions (KTIs) to guide implementation practitioners and researchers in the ongoing use of EBPs over time.

Methods: We combined the results of a systematic review and theory analysis of known sustainability frameworks/models/theories (F/M/Ts) with those from a case study using mixed methods that examined the ongoing use of an organization-wide pain EBP in a tertiary care center (hospital) in Canada. Data sources included peer-reviewed sustainability frameworks (n = 8) related to acute care, semi-structured interviews with nurses at the department (n = 3) and unit (n = 16) level, chart audits (n = 200), and document review (n = 29). We then compared unique framework components to the evolving literature and present main observations.

Results: We present the Sustaining Innovations in Tertiary Settings (SITS) framework which consists of 7 unique constructs, 49 determinants, and 29 related KTIs that influence the sustainability of EBPs in tertiary settings. Three determinants and 8 KTIs had a continuous influence during implementation and sustained use phases. Attention to the level of application and changing conditions over time affecting determinants is required for sustainment. Use of a participatory approach to engage users in designing remedial plans and linking KTIs to target behaviors that incrementally address low adherence rates promotes sustainability.

Conclusions: The SITS framework provides a novel resource to support future practice and research aimed at sustaining EBPs in tertiary settings and improving patient outcomes. Findings confirm the concept of sustainability is a "dynamic ongoing phase".

Keywords: adherence; evidence-based practices; frameworks/models/theories; guidelines; innovations; interventions; nursing; sustainability.