Compensation Claims After Hip Fracture Surgery in Norway 2008-2018

John Magne Hoseth; Tommy Frøseth Aae; Rune Bruhn Jakobsen; Anne Marie Fenstad; Ida Rashida Khan Bukholm; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Per-Henrik Randsborg

doi:10.1177/21514593231188623

Compensation Claims After Hip Fracture Surgery in Norway 2008-2018

Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2023 Jul 8:14:21514593231188623. doi: 10.1177/21514593231188623. eCollection 2023.

Authors

John Magne Hoseth^{1

2}, Tommy Frøseth Aae^{1

2}, Rune Bruhn Jakobsen^{3

4}, Anne Marie Fenstad⁵, Ida Rashida Khan Bukholm⁶, Jan-Erik Gjertsen^{5

7}, Per-Henrik Randsborg^{3

8}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kristiansund Hospital, Health Møre and Romsdal HF, Kristiansund, Norway.
² Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
³ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
⁴ Institute of Health and Society, The Medical Faculty, University of Oslo Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Oslo, Norway.
⁵ The Norwegian Hip Fracture Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
⁶ The Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation, Oslo, Norway.
⁷ Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
⁸ Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Abstract

Background: Surgical complications contribute to the significant mortality following hip fractures in the elderly. The purpose of this study was to increase our knowledge of surgical complications by evaluating compensation claims following hip fracture surgery in Norway. Further, we investigated whether the size and location of performing institutions would influence surgical complications.

Methods: We collected data from the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) and the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR) from 2008 to 2018. We classified institutions into 4 categories based on annual procedure volume and geographical location.

Results: 90,601 hip fractures were registered in NHFR. NPE received 616 (.7%) claims. Of these, 221 (36%) were accepted, which accounts for .2% of all hip fractures. Men had nearly a doubled risk of ending with a compensation claim compared to women (OR: 1.8, CI, 1.4-2.4, P < .001). Hospital-acquired infection was the most frequent reason for accepted claims (27%). However, claims were rejected if patients had underlying conditions predisposing to infection. Institutions treating fewer than 152 hip fractures (first quartile) annually, had a statistically significant increased risk (OR: 1.9, CI, 1.3-2.8, P = .005) for accepted claims compared to higher volume facilities.

Discussion: The fewer registered claims in our study could be due to the relatively high early mortality and frailty in this patient group, which may decrease the likelihood of filing a complaint. Men could have undetected underlying predisposing conditions that lead to increased risk of complications. Hospital-acquired infection may be the most significant complication following hip fracture surgery in Norway. Lastly, the number of procedures performed annually in an institution influences compensation claims.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that hospital acquired infections need greater focus following hip fracture surgery, especially in men. Lower volume hospitals may be a risk factor.

Keywords: Norwegian system of patient injury compensation; compensation claims; hip fracture register; hip fractures.