Reliability assessment of new radiographic scales to evaluate radiolucency and bony in-between fin growth of partially cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Apr;33(4):872-879. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.041. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

Abstract

Background: Current methods available for assessment of radiolucency and in-between fin (IBF) growth of a glenoid component have not undergone interobserver reliability testing for an all-polyethylene fluted central peg (FCP) glenoid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anteroposterior radiographs of an FCP glenoid component at ≥48 months comparing commonly used scales to a new method adapted to the FCP. Our hypothesis was that the new method would result in acceptable intra- and interobserver agreement and a more accurate description of radiographic findings.

Methods: We reviewed ≥48-month follow-up radiographs of patients treated with a primary aTSA using an FCP glenoid. Eighty-three patients were included in the review. Radiographs were evaluated by 5 reviewers using novel IBF radiodensity and radiolucency assessments and the Wirth and Lazarus methods. To assess intraobserver reliability, a subset of 40 images was reviewed. Kappa statistics were calculated to determine intra- and interobserver reliability; correlations were assessed using Pearson correlation.

Results: Interobserver agreement (κ score) was as follows: IBF 0.71, radiolucency 0.68, Wirth 0.48, and Lazarus 0.22. Intraobserver agreement ranges were as follows: IBF radiodensity 0.36-0.67, radiolucency 0.55-0.62, Wirth 0.11-0.73, and Lazarus 0.04-0.46. Correlation analysis revealed the following: IBF to Wirth r = 0.93, radiolucency to Lazarus r = 0.92 (P value <.001 for all).

Conclusion: This study introduces a radiographic assessment method developed specifically for an FCP glenoid component. Results show high interobserver and acceptable intraobserver reliability for the method presented in this study. The new scales provide a more accurate description of radiographic findings, helping to identify glenoid components that may be at risk for loosening.

Keywords: Shoulder arthroplasty; fluted central peg glenoid; glenoid failure; glenoid lucency; glenoid wear; polyethylene glenoid; radiographic review; reliability assessment.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement* / methods
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Glenoid Cavity* / diagnostic imaging
  • Glenoid Cavity* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Joint Prosthesis*
  • Polyethylene
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Shoulder Joint* / diagnostic imaging
  • Shoulder Joint* / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Polyethylene