Ambiguity in care delivery terminology: implications that affect pragmatic clinical trials using non-pharmacological interventions
BMJ Evid Based Med
.
2024 Sep 20;29(5):296-299.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112547.
Authors
Daniel I Rhon
1
2
,
Alison F Davis
3
,
Joseph Ali
4
,
Cynthia Brandt
5
6
,
Amy Burns
3
6
,
Whitley Lucio
2
7
,
Robert Vining
8
,
Stacey Young-McCaughan
9
Affiliations
1
Rehabilitation Medicine, US Army Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA daniel.rhon2.ctr@heallth.mil.
2
Rehabilitation Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
3
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
4
Johns Hopkins University Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
5
Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
6
VA Connecticut Healthcare, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.
7
The Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, Washington, USA.
8
Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa, USA.
9
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
PMID:
37989537
DOI:
10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112547
No abstract available
Keywords:
Ethics; Evidence-Based Practice; Health policy.
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic* / methods
Terminology as Topic*