Phylogenetic conservation of Trop-2 across species-rodent and primate genomics model anti-Trop-2 therapy for pre-clinical benchmarks

Front Genet. 2024 Jan 5:14:1297367. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1297367. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

A phylogenetic conservation analysis of Trop-2 across vertebrate species showed a high degree of sequence conservation, permitting to explore multiple models as pre-clinical benchmarks. Sequence divergence and incomplete conservation of expression patterns were observed in mouse and rat. Primate Trop-2 sequences were found to be 95%-100% identical to the human sequence. Comparative three-dimension primate Trop-2 structures were obtained with AlphaFold and homology modeling. This revealed high structure conservation of Trop-2 (0.66 ProMod3 GMQE, 0.80-0.86 ± 0.05 QMEANDisCo scores), with conservative amino acid changes at variant sites. Primate TACSTD2/TROP2 cDNAs were cloned and transfectants for individual ORF were shown to be efficiently recognized by humanized anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibodies (Hu2G10, Hu2EF). Immunohistochemistry analysis of Macaca mulatta (rhesus monkey) tissues showed Trop-2 expression patterns that closely followed those in human tissues. This led us to test Trop-2 targeting in vivo in Macaca fascicularis (cynomolgus monkey). Intravenously injected Hu2G10 and Hu2EF were well tolerated from 5 to 10 mg/kg. Neither neurological, respiratory, digestive, urinary symptoms, nor biochemical or hematological toxicities were detected during 28-day observation. Blood serum pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were conducted utilizing anti-idiotypic antibodies in capture-ELISA assays. Hu2G10 (t1/2 = 6.5 days) and Hu2EF (t1/2 = 5.5 days) were stable in plasma, and were detectable in the circulation up to 3 weeks after the infusion. These findings validate primates as reliable models for Hu2G10 and Hu2EF toxicity and PK, and support the use of these antibodies as next-generation anti-Trop-2 immunotherapy tools.

Keywords: Trop-2; pharmacokinetics; phylogenetic conservation; primate genomics; toxicity.

Grants and funding

The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Italian Ministry of Health (RicOncol RF-EMR-2006-361866) Italian Ministry of Development (FESR 2016–2018. SSI000651, art. 69 Reg. CE n. 1083/2006 and Reg. CE n. 1828/2006); Region Abruzzo (POR FESR 2007–2013: Activity 1.1.1 line B, C78C14000100005); Italian Ministry of University and Research (Grant PGR12I7N1Z) Programma Per Giovani Ricercatori “Rita Levi Montalcini” to MT; ONCOXX Biotech Srl; Mediterranea Theranostic Srl. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of this study, nor in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, nor in the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.