Objective: The objective of this study is to assess diagnostic yield of imaging modalities used to evaluate patients presenting with pulsatile tinnitus (PT).
Databases reviewed: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were queried using the search terms "pulsatile tinnitus," "pulse-synchronous tinnitus," and "pulse synchronous tinnitus" with no date limitations.
Methods: Studies that reported diagnostic imaging for patients presenting with PT were included. Data were reviewed for sample size, gender, age, imaging study, indications, and diagnoses. The primary outcome measure from aggregated data was the yield of positive diagnoses made with each imaging modality. The quality of evidence was assessed for risk of bias.
Results: From an initial search of 1145 articles, 17 manuscripts met inclusion criteria, of which 12 studies evaluated individual imaging modalities. The number of unique patients included was 1232. The diagnostic yield varied between modalities: carotid ultrasound (21%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12%-35%), CT temporal bone (65%, CI: 20%-93%), computed tomographic angiography (86%, CI: 80%-90%), and MRI/magnetic resonance angiography (58%, CI: 43%-72%).
Conclusion: Studies on the diagnostic approach to PT are limited by heterogeneity in both inclusion criteria and reporting standards. A wide range of imaging modalities are used in practice during the initial evaluation of PT, and the diagnostic yield for imaging can be improved by utilizing more specific clinical indications.
Keywords: Diagnosis; Imaging; Meta-analysis; Pulsatile tinnitus; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Otology & Neurotology, Inc.