A New Model for Ranking Schools of Public Health: The Public Health Academic Ranking

Int J Public Health. 2024 Mar 11:69:1606684. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606684. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: As there is no ranking designed for schools of Public Health, the aim of this project was to create one. Methods: To design the Public Health Academic Ranking (PHAR), we used the InCites Benchmarking and Analytics™ software and the Web Of Science™ Core Collection database. We collected bibliometric data on 26 schools of Public Health from each continent, between August and September 2022. We included 11 research indicators/scores, covering four criteria (productivity, quality, accessibility for readers, international collaboration), for the period 2017-2021. For the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), a network gathering faculties across different universities, a specific methodology was used, with member-specific research queries. Results: The five top schools of the PHAR were: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Public Health Foundation of India, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, SSPH+, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Conclusion: The PHAR allows worldwide bibliometric ordering of schools of Public Health. As this is a pilot project, the results must be taken with caution. This article aims to critically discuss its methodology and future improvements.

Keywords: normalized bibliometric indicators; public health; public health academia; ranking methodology; schools of public health; university rankings.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Hygiene
  • Pilot Projects
  • Public Health* / education
  • Schools*
  • Universities

Grants and funding

This project was funded by the Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva. Access to the software was funded by the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, a SSPH+ Foundation university, which owns a license to the software.