Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition: an Effective Strategy to Manage Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2024 Jun;19(3):120-137. doi: 10.1007/s11899-024-00731-0. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

Abstract

Purpose of review: The treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) has evolved over the past decade. With the seminal discoveries of MYD88 and CXCR warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infections, and myelokathexis (WHIM) mutations in WM cells, our understanding of the disease biology and treatment has improved. The development of a new class of agents, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), has substantially impacted the treatment paradigm of WM. Herein, we review the current and emerging BTKi and the evidence for their use in WM.

Recent findings: Clinical trials have established the role of covalent BTKi in the treatment of WM. Their efficacy is compromised among patients who harbor CXCR4WHIM mutation or MYD88WT genotype. The development of BTKC481 mutation-mediated resistance to covalent BTKi may lead to disease refractoriness. Novel, non-covalent, next-generation BTKi are emerging, and preliminary results of the early phase clinical trials show promising activity in WM, even among patients refractory to a covalent BTKi. Covalent BTK inhibitors have demonstrated meaningful outcomes in treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed refractory (R/R) WM, particularly among those harboring the MYD88L265P mutation. The next-generation BTKi demonstrate improved selectivity, resulting in a more favorable toxicity profile. In WM, BTKi are administered until progression or the development of intolerable toxicity. Consequently, the potential for acquired resistance, the emergence of cumulative toxicities, and treatment-related financial burden are critical challenges associated with the continuous therapy approach. By circumventing BTK C481 mutations that alter the binding site to covalent BTKi, the non-covalent BTKi serve as alternative agents in the event of acquired resistance. Head-to-head comparative trials with the conventional chemoimmunotherapies are lacking. The findings of the RAINBOW trial (NCT046152), comparing the dexamethasone, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide (DRC) regimen to the first-generation, ibrutinib are awaited, but more studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on the comparative efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy and BTKi. Complete response is elusive with BTKi, and combination regimens to improve upon the efficacy and limit the treatment duration are also under evaluation in WM.

Keywords: CXCR4 mutation; IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma; Lymphoproliferative disorder; MYD88 mutation; Monoclonal gammopathy.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase* / genetics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Disease Management
  • Humans
  • Mutation
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors* / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia* / drug therapy
  • Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia* / genetics

Substances

  • Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors
  • BTK protein, human

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT046152