A comparative review of Aphexda and Mozobil for mobilization prior to stem cell collection

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2024 Sep;30(6):1073-1077. doi: 10.1177/10781552241247472. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

Abstract

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the standard of care for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma leading to prolonged progression free and overall survival. Successful engraftment following hematopoietic stem cell infusion requires adequate stem cell doses. Current mobilization regimens include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with or without plerixafor. Motixafortide is a recently approved agent that can be used in combination with G-CSF for mobilization. In the absence of any head-to-head trials comparing the two products, this article aims to outline the similarities and differences of these two agents. Though moxitafortide has a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile in comparison to plerixafor, in clinical trials, the agents demonstrated similar efficacy. In addition, the use of motixafortide in clinical practice may be limited by product cost as well as administration and monitoring requirements.

Keywords: Autologous transplant; mobilization; motixafortide; plerixafor; stem cell.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Benzylamines*
  • Cyclams* / pharmacology
  • Cyclams* / therapeutic use
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / administration & dosage
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization* / methods
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / methods
  • Heterocyclic Compounds / administration & dosage
  • Heterocyclic Compounds / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Multiple Myeloma* / drug therapy
  • Multiple Myeloma* / therapy
  • Transplantation, Autologous

Substances

  • Benzylamines
  • Cyclams
  • plerixafor
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
  • Heterocyclic Compounds