Pattern Recognition or Adnexal MR Scoring System: Which Is More Accurate in Evaluating Adnexal Lesions?

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):1265-1270. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.4.1265.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the accuracy of the ADNEX MR scoring system and pattern recognition system to evaluate adnexal lesions indeterminate on the US exam.

Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, pelvic DCE-MRI of 245 patients with 340 adnexal masses was studied based on the ADNEX MR scoring system and pattern recognition system.

Results: ADNEX MR scoring system with a sensitivity of 96.6% and specificity of 91% has an accuracy of 92.9%. The pattern recognition system's sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are 95.8%, 93.3%, and 94.7%, respectively. PPV and NPV for the ADNEX MR scoring system were 85.1 and 98.1, respectively. PPV and NPV for the pattern recognition system were 89.7% and 97.7%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for the ADNEX MR scoring system and pattern recognition system is 0.938 (95% CI, 0.909-0.967) and 0.950 (95% CI, 0.922-0.977). Pairwise comparison of these AUCs showed no significant difference (p = 0.052).

Conclusion: The pattern recognition system is less sensitive than the ADNEX MR scoring system, yet more specific.

Keywords: Keywords: adnexal lesions; MR scoring system; Pattern Recognition.

MeSH terms

  • Adnexa Uteri / diagnostic imaging
  • Adnexa Uteri / pathology
  • Adnexal Diseases* / diagnosis
  • Adnexal Diseases* / diagnostic imaging
  • Adnexal Diseases* / pathology
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Pattern Recognition, Automated / methods
  • Prognosis
  • ROC Curve
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult