Impact of residual induction number of non-pulmonary vein foci on the 2-year outcomes in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Background: Residual non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci are significantly associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, we previously reported among patients with non-PV foci induced only once, none experienced AF recurrence. Thus, we aimed to investigate the correlation between the residual induction number of non-PV foci and ablation outcome in paroxysmal AF patients.

Methods and results: We investigated 55 paroxysmal AF patients with residual non-PV foci after PVI and ablation of non-PV-foci. Study patients were classified into the residual one-time induction of non-PV foci (residual OTI-nPVF) group (n = 23) and residual repeatedly induced non-PV foci (residual RI-nPVF) group (n = 32). Furthermore, the residual RI-nPVF group was divided into the low inducibility group (n = 10) and high inducibility group (n = 22) according to the presence or absence of non-PV foci provoked by two sets of drug induction tests (non-PV foci inducibility). In addition, the latter was divided into the ablation group (n = 14) or observation group (n = 8). The 2-year AF recurrence-free rate in the residual RI-nPVF group was significantly lower compared to the residual OTI-nPVF group (53% vs. 90%, p = 0.018). There was no significant difference of the 2-year AF recurrence-free rates in the inducibility of non-PV foci (p = 0.913) and the presence or absence of ablation (p = 0.812) in the residual RI-nPVF group.

Conclusions: Among paroxysmal AF patients, the presence of residual RI-nPVF was associated with higher AF recurrence compared to residual OTI-nPVF. Furthermore, within residual RI-nPVF subgroup, non-PV foci inducibility or ablation of some residual RI-nPVF did not affect ablation outcome.

Keywords: Adenosine; Catheter ablation; Induction test; Isoproterenol; Non-pulmonary vein foci; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.