Fat quantification in dual-layer detector spectral CT: How to handle iron overload, varying tube voltage and radiation dose Indices

PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0302863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302863. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: Opposed to other spectral CT techniques, fat quantification in dual-layer detector CT (dlCT) has only recently been developed. The impact of concomitant iron overload and dlCT-specific protocol settings such as the dose right index (DRI), a measure of image noise and tube current, on dlCT fat quantification was unclear. Further, spectral information became newly available <120 kV. Therefore, this study's objective was to evaluate the impact of iron, changing tube voltage, and DRI on dlCT fat quantification.

Material and methods: Phantoms with 0 and 8mg/cm3 iron; 0 and 5mg/cm3 iodine; 0, 10, 20, 35, 50, and 100% fat and liver equivalent, respectively, were scanned with a dlCT (CT7500, Philips, the Netherlands) at 100kV/20DRI, 120kV/20DRI, 140kV/20DRI, and at 120kV/16DRI, 120kV/24DRI. Material decomposition was done for fat, liver, and iodine (A1); for fat, liver, and iron (A2); and for fat, liver, and combined reference values of iodine and iron (A3). All scans were analyzed with reference values from 120kV/20DRI. For statistics, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used.

Results: In phantoms with iron and iodine, results were best for A3 with a mean deviation to phantom fat of 1.3±2.6% (ICC 0.999 [95%-confidence interval 0.996-1]). The standard approach A1 yielded a deviation of -2.5±3.0% (0.998[0.994-0.999]), A2 of 6.1±4.8% (0.991[0.974-0.997]). With A3 and changing tube voltage, the maximal difference between quantified fat and the phantom ground truth occurred at 100kV with 4.6±2.1%. Differences between scans were largest between 100kV and 140kV (2.0%[-7.1-11.2]). The maximal difference of changing DRI occurred between 16 and 24 DRI with 0.4%[-2.2-3.0].

Conclusion: For dlCT fat quantification in the presence of iron, material decomposition with combined reference values for iodine and iron delivers the most accurate results. Tube voltage-specific calibration of reference values is advisable while the impact of the DRI on dlCT fat quantification is neglectable.

MeSH terms

  • Adipose Tissue / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Iodine
  • Iron / analysis
  • Iron Overload* / diagnostic imaging
  • Liver / diagnostic imaging
  • Liver / metabolism
  • Phantoms, Imaging*
  • Radiation Dosage*
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed* / methods

Substances

  • Iron
  • Iodine

Grants and funding

I.M. and P.S. have received funding for interdisciplinary projects from the research center of medical technology of the technical university in Hamburg and the university medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf (04fmthh2020). https://www.fmthh.de/ Study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript were all independent of the funder.