Evaluating the surgical trainee ergonomic experience during minimally invasive abdominal surgery (ESTEEMA study)

Sci Rep. 2024 May 31;14(1):12502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63516-8.

Abstract

Minimally invasive abdominal surgery (MAS) can exert a physical cost. Surgical trainees spend years assisting minimally-invasive surgeries, increasing the risk of workplace injury. This prospective questionnaire-based cohort study was conducted amongst general surgery residents in Singapore. Residents assisting major MAS surgery were invited to complete anonymous online survey forms after surgery. The Phase 1 survey assessed physical discomfort scores and risk factors. Intraoperative measures to improve ergonomics were administered and evaluated in Phase 2. During Phase 1 (October 2021 to April 2022), physical discomfort was reported in at least one body part in 82.6% (n = 38) of respondents. Over a third of respondents reported severe discomfort in at least one body part (n = 17, 37.0%). Extremes of height, training seniority, longer surgical duration and operative complexity were significant risk factors for greater physical discomfort. In Phase 2 (October 2022 to February 2023), the overall rate of physical symptoms and severe discomfort improved to 81.3% (n = 52) and 34.4% (n = 22) respectively. The ergonomic measure most found useful was having separate television monitors for the primary surgeon and assistants, followed by intraoperative feedback on television monitor angle or position. Close to 20% of survey respondents felt that surgeon education was likely to improve physical discomfort.

MeSH terms

  • Abdomen* / surgery
  • Adult
  • Ergonomics*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internship and Residency
  • Male
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures* / education
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Singapore
  • Surgeons / education
  • Surveys and Questionnaires