Electroconvulsive therapy for the acute management of severe agitation in dementia (ECT-AD): A modified study protocol

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 28;19(6):e0303894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303894. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Objective: This study began as a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for severe treatment-refractory agitation in advanced dementia. The aims are to assess agitation reduction using the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), evaluate tolerability and safety outcomes, and explore the long-term stability of agitation reduction and global functioning. Due to challenges encountered during implementation, including recruitment obstacles and operational difficulties, the study design was modified to an open-label format and other protocol amendments were implemented.

Methods: Initially, the RCT randomized participants 1:1 to either ECT plus usual care or simulated ECT plus usual care (S-ECT) groups. As patients were enrolled, data were collected from both ECT and simulated ECT (S-ECT) patients. The study now continues in an open-label study design where all patients receive actual ECT, reducing the targeted sample size from 200 to 50 participants.

Results: Study is ongoing and open to enrollment.

Conclusion: The transition of the ECT-AD study design from an RCT to open-label design exemplifies adaptive research methodologies in response to real-world challenges. Data from both the RCT and open-label phases of the study will provide a unique perspective on the role of ECT in managing severe treatment-refractory agitation in dementia, potentially influencing future clinical practices and research approaches.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia
  • Aged
  • Dementia* / complications
  • Dementia* / therapy
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Psychomotor Agitation* / therapy
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

This work is supported by the National Institute on Aging (AG061100). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no competing interests.