Venetoclax (Ven) combined with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) enhances survival in elderly/unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, yet often necessitates regimen modifications due to intolerance. However, it is unclear how these modifications affect patient outcome. This retrospective cohort study evaluates the impact of post-induction HMA/Ven regimen modifications on disease progression and survival. This study reviewed 142 AML patients treated with HMA/Ven within the Northwell Health System from January 2019 to December 2022. To assess the impact of post-induction regimen modifications, patients were grouped according to median days between cycles (≤34 or ≥35 days cycle intervals) and median Ven days per cycle (≤14 or ≥15 days/cycle) based on only cycle 3 and beyond. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were employed for univariate and multivariate assessments, respectively. There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival (mPFS)(11.6 vs 11.8 months, p = 0.73) or median overall survival (mOS)(15.1 vs 21.8 months, p = 0.16) between cycle interval groups. However, there was a clinically and statistically significant advantage in mPFS (15.8 vs 8.7 months, p = 0.01) and mOS (24.7 vs 11.3 months, p = 0.006) for patients with a median of ≤14 Ven days/cycle compared to ≥15 Ven days/cycle. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ≤14 days of Ven for cycle 3 and beyond was an independent predictor of decreased mortality (HR 0.18, CI 0.07-0.48, p = 0.0007). Extended cycle intervals did not adversely affect mortality while reduced Ven duration per cycle post-induction was associated with improved survival in elderly AML patients.
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; Hypomethylating agents; Survival outcomes; Venetoclax.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.