Background: Research indicates that people with Parkinson's disease (PwPs) may experience challenges in both peripheral and central auditory processing, although findings are inconsistent across studies. Due to the diversity of auditory measures used, there is a need for standardized, replicable hearing assessments to clarify which aspects of audition are impacted in PWPs and whether they are linked to motor and non-motor symptoms.
Objective: To characterize auditory processes and their possible alteration in PwPs. To address this, we collected a comprehensive set of standardized measures of audition using PART, a digital testing platform designed to facilitate replication. Additionally, we examined the relationship between auditory, cognitive, and clinical variables in PwPs.
Methods: We included 44 PwPs and 54 age and education matched healthy controls. Assessments included detection of diotic and dichotic frequency modulation, temporal gaps, spectro-temporal broad-band modulation, and speech-on-speech masking.
Results: We found no statistically significant differences in auditory processing measures between PwPs and the comparison group (ps > 0.07). In PwPs, an auditory processing composite score showed significant medium size correlations with cognitive measures (0.39 < r<0.41, ps < 0.02) and clinical variables of motor symptom severity, quality of life, depression, and caretaker burden (0.33 < r<0.52, ps < 0.03).
Conclusions: While larger datasets are needed to clarify whether PwPs experience more auditory difficulties than healthy controls, our results underscore the importance of considering auditory processing on the symptomatic spectrum of Parkinson's disease using standardized replicable methodologies.
Keywords: Mexico; Parkinson’s disease; Psychometrics; auditory processing; cognition; digital assessment; hearing; non-motor symptoms.
It is unknown whether there exists a relationship between Parkinson’s disease (PD) and hearing ability. While some studies have found hearing difficulties to be associated with PD, other studies failed to replicate these effects. We suggest that a possible reason for these differing findings are differences in how hearing is measured. To clarify the literature, we tested a group of people with Parkinson’s (PwPs) on several aspects of hearing using a freely available tablet-based app. We compared PwPs hearing tests to those of an age and education matched group of people without PD. While we found no clear differences among the groups, we did find better hearing abilities were related to less motor symptom severity and depression, better reported quality of life, and less reported burden of the disease experienced by the caretaker. We conclude that while there is no solid evidence showing the hearing is necessarily impaired in PD, that measuring hearing in PwPs can provide valuable clinical information. This can inform new approaches to treatment for people living with PD such as those related with improving hearing.