GRAPPA Point-Counterpoint: Should Biologics Be Used for Mild Psoriasis?

J Rheumatol. 2024 Oct 1;51(Suppl 2):39-42. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0655.

Abstract

Psoriasis (PsO) is commonly classified as mild, moderate, or severe, usually based on body surface area (BSA) or other validated measures. Although most dermatologists agree that mild PsO should be treated with topical therapies, there are circumstances where mild or limited PsO should be treated with biologics, even as first line. A debate about use of topical vs biologic therapy was presented at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting. Arguments in favor of using biologics when patients have mild disease on limited BSA included presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and symptoms on special sites (ie, scalp, face, body folds, genitals, nails, palms, soles). New data suggest that treating limited or early PsO may decrease the risk of developing PsA. Arguments against using biologics for mild PsO focused on the definition of mild PsO, citing that limited BSA with PsA and significant quality of life impact should not be defined as mild. Truly mild PsO should be treated with topical agents, given their safety and relative low cost. The availability of newer agents like roflumilast and tapinarof have expanded therapeutic choice and have data supporting their use for treatment of special sites.

Keywords: GRAPPA; biological therapy; psoriasis; psoriatic arthritis.

MeSH terms

  • Arthritis, Psoriatic / diagnosis
  • Arthritis, Psoriatic / drug therapy
  • Biological Products* / therapeutic use
  • Congresses as Topic
  • Dermatologic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Psoriasis* / diagnosis
  • Psoriasis* / drug therapy
  • Quality of Life
  • Severity of Illness Index*

Substances

  • Biological Products
  • Dermatologic Agents