Neighborhood economic vulnerability as a predictor for patterns of care and outcomes for patients with uterine cancer

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the effect of neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as it relates to racial disparity in uterine cancer treatment and survival.

Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy in New York State from 2004 to 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability as quantified by the Area Deprivation Index was calculated. Primary outcome was guideline adherent treatment; secondary outcome was 5 year overall survival.

Results: A total of 34,356 patients were included in the final cohort. Residence within a vulnerable neighborhood was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy (59.7% vs 75.7% with aRR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86) and timely surgery (63.7% vs. 74.5% with aRR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.87). All-cause mortality was 24% higher for those who resided in vulnerable neighborhoods compared to affluent neighborhoods (aHR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16-1.32). The greatest Black/White racial disparity in 5 year overall survival was seen in the most affluent neighborhoods at 18.6%, with survival being 79.8% for White patients and 61.2% for Black patients (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 1.14-1.51). For patients with advanced stage disease, this disparity was driven by improved survival for White patients with increasing neighborhood affluence but no change in survival for Black patients. On adjusted analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, insurance, tumor histology, stage, and grade, the disparity remained widest in the most affluent neighborhoods in NYC (aHR = 1.59; 95%CI 1.26-1.2.01).

Conclusions: Neighborhood socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with poor outcomes for patients with uterine cancer. The greatest Black/White survival disparities are in the wealthiest neighborhoods. Neighborhood affluence may not affect survival of Black patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer.

Keywords: Area deprivation index; Disparities; Endometrial cancer; Equity; Gynecologic cancer; Neighborhood socioeconomic status.