Preventing proximal enamel caries in neighboring tooth with glass ionomer cement restoration and silver diamine fluoride pretreatment

J Dent. 2024 Oct:149:105312. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105312. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate caries preventive effects of 38 % silver diamine fluoride (SDF) pretreatment on neighboring tooth proximal to glass ionomer cement (GIC), including conventional GIC (CGIC) and resin-modified GIC (RMGIC) restorations in an in vitro model.

Methods: HUMAN TOOTH BLOCKS WERE RESTORED WITH: SDF+CGIC (Group 1), CGIC (Group 2), SDF+RMGIC (Group 3) or RMGIC (Group 4). Enamel specimen simulating proximal surface of neighboring tooth was placed in proximity to the restorations. The specimen underwent cariogenic challenge with cross-kingdom biofilm of Streptococcus mutans, Lacticaseibacillus casei and Candida albicans. After cariogenic challenge, the biofilm's growth kinetics, viability, and morphology were evaluated by propidium monoazide-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PMA-qPCR), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. The enamel lesion depth, surface morphology and crystal characteristics were determined by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), SEM and X-ray diffraction (XRD), respectively.

Results: PMA-qPCR demonstrated lower microbial growth in Group 1 and 3 compared with Group 2 and 4 (p < 0.05). CLSM showed the dead-to-live ratio in Groups 1-4 were 1.15±0.12, 0.53±0.13, 1.10±0.24 and 0.63±0.10, respectively (Group 1,3 > 2,4, p < 0.05). SEM revealed Groups 1 and 3 had scattered biofilm whereas Group 2 and 4 had confluent biofilm. Micro-CT showed the enamel lesion depths (µm) were 98±9, 126±7, 103±6 and 128±7 for Group 1 to 4, respectively (Group 1,3 < 2,4, p < 0.05). SEM revealed oriented and ordered enamel prismatic patterns in Group 1 and 3, not in Group 2 and 4. XRD showed the reflections of hydroxyapatite in Groups 1 and 3 were sharper than Groups 2 and 4.

Conclusion: SDF pretreatment enhances the preventive effect of GIC on proximal enamel surface on neighboring tooth through inhibiting cariogenic biofilm, reducing enamel demineralization and promoting enamel remineralization.

Clinical significance: SDF pretreatment of GIC restorations can help prevent caries on neighboring teeth, particular for patients with high caries risk.

Keywords: Dental caries; Enamel; Glass ionomer cement; Prevention; Remineralisation; Silver diamine fluoride.

MeSH terms

  • Biofilms* / drug effects
  • Candida albicans / drug effects
  • Cariostatic Agents* / pharmacology
  • Cariostatic Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Dental Caries* / microbiology
  • Dental Caries* / prevention & control
  • Dental Enamel* / drug effects
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent / methods
  • Fluorides, Topical* / pharmacology
  • Fluorides, Topical* / therapeutic use
  • Glass Ionomer Cements* / pharmacology
  • Glass Ionomer Cements* / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Microscopy, Confocal
  • Microscopy, Electron, Scanning*
  • Quaternary Ammonium Compounds* / pharmacology
  • Quaternary Ammonium Compounds* / therapeutic use
  • Silver Compounds* / pharmacology
  • Silver Compounds* / therapeutic use
  • Streptococcus mutans* / drug effects
  • X-Ray Diffraction
  • X-Ray Microtomography

Substances

  • Silver Compounds
  • silver diamine fluoride
  • Glass Ionomer Cements
  • Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
  • Fluorides, Topical
  • Cariostatic Agents