Purpose: This study explores the views of people living with Motor Neurone Disease (MND) when they consider Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) insertion, to understand their priorities and how their decisions were informed or supported.
Materials and methods: The study took place in single multidisciplinary specialised MND clinic in New South Wales, Australia. Nine people with MND (5 male and 4 female; age range 52-73 years; disease duration 6-99 months) who were considering, or had recently undergone PEG insertion, participated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants to examine individual's experience of decision-making about PEG. The data were synthesised and analysed thematically.
Results: Three main themes and two sub-themes captured participant views on their decision-making. The first, "What matters most to me," comprised optimising quality of life and maintaining family membership. The second theme explored "Understanding PEG and the clinical pathway." The third theme was "Thoughts on using a decision aid."
Conclusions: This study provides a foundation for future studies examining the longer-term outcomes of accepting, delaying or declining PEG. Insights from this study may be applicable to decision-making for any aspect of MND care where the outcomes or benefits are uncertain.
Keywords: Patient decision-making; carer burden; informed choice; multidisciplinary care; quality of life.
People living with Motor Neurone Disease (MND) have complex and individual reasons for accepting or declining Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG).The quality of communication between people with MND and healthcare providers may be improved by a shared understanding of how people with MND view quality of life and carer burden in their own circumstances.Enhanced communication for informed choice and patient-centred decision-making have potential to reduce decision regret and support care pathways for those who decline PEG.