Can green firebreaks help balance biodiversity, carbon storage and wildfire risk?

Abstract

Green firebreaks (strategically placed plantings of low-flammability vegetation) are designed to reduce the rate of fire spread and thereby increase the suppressibility of fires. Successful examples have led to some fire-prone regions investing heavily in the establishment of green firebreaks as a method of reducing fire risk while improving biodiversity and carbon storage. However, beyond small-scale case studies there has been little research quantitatively exploring the interactions among biodiversity, carbon, and wildfire risk in relation to green firebreaks. Here, we combine a Bayesian Network (BN) analysis, and fire simulations in PHOENIX RapidFire (hereafter Phoenix), to identify planting designs that reduce wildfire risks while also providing positive biodiversity and carbon outcomes. Using a BN analysis, we prioritised optimal planting designs as the combination of elements (e.g., stem density, distance from houses, shrub design, age etc.) that delivered the greatest increase in biodiversity and carbon while reducing fire risk to people and property for eight sites across south-eastern Australia. We ranked combinations of planting designs, prioritising house, and life loss first, to identify optimal designs. Optimal planting designs varied among sites, although the design elements that best reduced risk to houses and lives were consistent. These elements included 'scattered' shrubs and planting densities of trees consistent with an open forest structure. Estimated fuel loads for the optimal planting design at each site were used to create a simulated revegetation area in Phoenix. We simulated fire behaviour in Phoenix across a grid of ∼1000 ignitions for each site, and for up to 54 historic weather conditions for a 'current fuel' scenario (no green firebreaks present) compared with a 'green firebreak fuel' scenario. We found that the establishment of a green firebreak did not result in significant changes to fire behaviour at most sites. In some cases, it reduced risk to people and property, and where fire behaviour did change in terms of intensity, frequency, ember attack and overall risk, the differences relative to the current fuel scenario were less than two percent. Overall, simulated green firebreaks in most cases were found to provide biodiversity and carbon benefits without increasing fire risk. These findings illustrate their potential as an effective nature-based solution for managing multiple priorities; however, further testing of real plantings is required to evaluate this potential as an at-scale solution.