Three-dimensional (3D)-printed models of bones are a convenient and durable alternative to real bone specimens, and they have been used in anatomy laboratories. It is necessary to identify the precise advantages of 3D-printed models from all perspectives; not only the improvement in students' knowledge of anatomy but also the students' assessment of such models. Here, students of veterinary medicine and animal science evaluated the reproducibility and effectiveness of 3D-printed models as a learning tool by completing our questionnaires, with a focus on their understanding of the skull-morphological differences among dog breeds. With the COVID-19 pandemic having obliged veterinary universities to provide courses online, we also investigated how the pandemic affected the students' evaluation of the 3D-printed models. The questionnaire results revealed that the animal science students were satisfied with the reproducibility of the 3D-printed models, but the veterinary students were not (they preferred to use real specimens). The skull differences were well understood by both types of students, indicating that 3D-printed models are effective for learning about rare skeletal specimens. The veterinary students who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic tended to choose real specimens more often than those who did not have this experience. Our results suggest that the use of 3D-printed models as an introduction and the use of real specimens in anatomy laboratory courses can be adequate for veterinary students. Together our findings suggest ways to improve the educational performance of 3D-printed models for veterinary students who need to understand the anatomy of many species.
Keywords: COVID-19; bone specimen; dog breed difference; veterinary anatomy laboratory.