Resettlement willingness: From a village environmental perspective

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0305476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305476. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Breaking the limitations of the urban perspective, there is an urgent need to study the influence of the village environment on the willingness of rural households to resettle. This paper explored the determinants and the mechanism of village environment factors on resettlement willingness using full-sample survey data (872,414 households) of 1382 administrative villages in Huai'an, a typical agricultural area in Eastern China. The result revealed that environmental factors generally have a greater impact on the spatial heterogeneity of resettlement willingness, in the order of natural environment, economic environment, social environment, and policy environment; among which geographic location, housing conditions, behavioral tendency of farmers and planning guidance are the key factors. In addition, the absolute location of the urban area in the geographic region has a significantly greater effect than that of the county, and the "following behavior" of the farmers affected their resettlement decision. Therefore, differentiated policies should be formulated according to the spatial distribution of the resettlement willingness, building a dual-core village and town system within the county.

MeSH terms

  • Agriculture
  • China
  • Environment
  • Family Characteristics
  • Farmers / psychology
  • Humans
  • Rural Population*
  • Social Environment
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078237); and the National Research Foundation of Korea grant, which is funded by the Government of South Korea (NRF-2020R1A2C1008509). The funders played an important role in the study. The first grant leader, Chengxiang Wang, was responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, validation, data curation, writing, etc. Chang Gyu Choi, the leader of the second fund, was responsible for conceptualization, resources, supervision, project administration, etc. in this study. A detailed description of this is given in the author contribution section of our paper.