Medical Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Patients With Systolic Heart Failure

Circ J. 2024 Sep 3. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0205. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) may result in systolic heart failure (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]), but its response to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains uncertain.

Methods and results: We investigated 881 patients evaluated for CS to identify those with diagnosed CS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% at diagnosis, and follow-up echocardiogram within 11-24 months. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT as quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score, and immunosuppressive treatment were recorded. The primary outcome was a composite of event-free survival (unplanned heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular assist device [LVAD]/heart transplant, or death). Seventy-nine (9%) CS patients met the inclusion criteria (35% female, median age 57 years, mean LVEF 30.9%, median New York Heart Association class II [46%], mean number of GDMT agents 1.7, and mean KCMO score 31.8). Most (87%) were treated with immunosuppressive treatment. At follow-up (median 16 months), the mean number of GDMT agents increased to 2.2 (P=0.02), and the mean KCMO score to 70.1 (P<0.001). Mean LVEF improved to 39.9% (excluding LVAD/transplant; P<0.001) and the change in LVEF was correlated with follow-up KCMO score (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 13 (16%) patients and differed by KCMO score (log-rank P<0.001), but not by immunosuppressive treatment (log-rank P=0.36).

Conclusions: GDMT optimization is associated with better cardiac remodeling and clinical outcomes in CS patients with HFrEF.

Keywords: Cardiac sarcoidosis; Guideline-directed medical therapy; Heart failure; Immunosuppression.