Niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

Ann Oncol. 2024 Nov;35(11):981-992. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2241. Epub 2024 Sep 14.

Abstract

Background: The phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported.

Patients and methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical [overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) population]. Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cut-off date, 8 April 2024).

Results: The median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio was 1.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23; P = 0.8834] for niraparib (n = 487) versus placebo (n = 246). In the HRd (n = 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n = 249) populations, the OS hazard ratios were 0.95 (95% CI 0.70-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusions: In patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were two times as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile.

Keywords: PARP inhibitor; maintenance; niraparib; ovarian cancer; overall survival.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Indazoles* / administration & dosage
  • Indazoles* / adverse effects
  • Indazoles* / therapeutic use
  • Maintenance Chemotherapy* / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Ovarian Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Ovarian Neoplasms* / mortality
  • Ovarian Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Phthalazines / administration & dosage
  • Phthalazines / adverse effects
  • Phthalazines / therapeutic use
  • Piperidines* / administration & dosage
  • Piperidines* / adverse effects
  • Piperidines* / therapeutic use
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors* / administration & dosage
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors* / adverse effects
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors* / therapeutic use
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Survival Rate

Substances

  • niraparib
  • Indazoles
  • Piperidines
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
  • Phthalazines