Background: Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) dysregulation has been implicated in the pathophysiology of trauma-related psychopathology, and there are direct interactions between the endocannabinoid and glutamatergic systems. However, relationships between cannabis use (CU) and mGlu5 have not been directly investigated in trauma-related psychopathology.
Methods: Using positron emission tomography with [18F]FPEB, we examined relationships between CU status and mGlu5 availability in vivo in a cross-diagnostic sample of individuals with trauma-related psychopathology (n = 55). Specifically, we tested whether mGlu5 availability in frontolimbic regions of interest (ROIs; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus) differed as a function of CU status.
Results: Past-year CU (n = 22) was associated with 18.62%-19.12% higher mGlu5 availability in frontal and 14.24%-16.55% higher mGlu5 in limbic ROIs relative to participants with no recent CU. Similarly, past-month or monthly CU (n = 16) was associated with higher mGlu5 availability in frontal (18.05%-20.62%) and limbic (15.53%-16.83%) ROIs. mGlu5 availability in the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala was negatively associated with depressive symptoms in the past-year CU group. In both CU groups, exploratory analyses showed negative correlations between mGlu5 availability and sadness across all ROIs and with perceptions of worthlessness and past failures (r's = -.47 to .66, P's = .006-.033) in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Participants with CU reported lower mean depressive symptoms (P's = .006-.037) relative to those without CU.
Conclusions: These findings have substantial implications for our understanding of interactions between CU and glutamatergic neurotransmission in trauma-related psychopathology, underscoring the need for treatment development efforts to consider the effects of CU in this population.
Keywords: PTSD; cannabis; depression; mGlu5; trauma.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.