Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the patient with obesity

Mallory Loe; Jacob M Broome; Lauren Mueller; John T Simpson; Danielle Tatum; Patrick McGrew; Sharven Taghavi; Olan Jackson-Weaver; Joseph DuBose; Juan Duchesne

doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000004411

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the patient with obesity

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Sep 27. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004411. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Mallory Loe¹, Jacob M Broome, Lauren Mueller, John T Simpson, Danielle Tatum, Patrick McGrew, Sharven Taghavi, Olan Jackson-Weaver, Joseph DuBose, Juan Duchesne

Affiliation

¹ From the Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery (M.L., J.M.B., L.M., J.T.S., D.T., P.M., S.T., O.J., J.D.), Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana; and R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (J.D.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

PMID: 39330924
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004411

Abstract

Background: Palpation of anatomic landmarks is difficult in patients with obesity, which could increase difficulty of achieving femoral access and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) placement. The primary aim of this study was to examine the association between obesity and successful REBOA placement. We hypothesized that higher body mass index (BMI) would decrease first-attempt success and increase time to successful aortic occlusion (AO).

Methods: A review of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry was performed on patients who underwent REBOA placement with initiation systolic blood pressure >0 mm Hg from years 2013-2022. Patients were excluded if they received cardiopulmonary resuscitation on arrival, underwent open AO, or missing data entries for variables of interest. Body mass index categorization was as follows: non-obese (<30), class I (30-34.9), class II (35-39.9), and class III (40+) obesity. Patients were also stratified by access technique, including use of palpation or ultrasound guidance.

Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 410 patients. On binary analysis, no primary outcomes of interest, including rate of success, time to placement, or mortality, were significantly impacted by BMI. Among BMI subgroups, there was no statistical difference in injury severity, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), or augmented SBP. At initiation of aortic occlusion, patients with class II and class III obesity had higher median SBP compared with non- and class I obese patients (p = 0.03). Body mass index subgroup did not impact likelihood of first-attempt success or conversion to open procedure. When stratified by access technique, there was no difference in success rates, time to success or mortality between groups.

Conclusion: Body habitus did not impact success of REBOA placement, time to successful AO, or mortality. Further, ultrasound guidance was not superior to landmark palpation for arterial access. Following traumatic injury without hemodynamic collapse, obesity should not deter providers from considering REBOA placement.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care management, Observational, Cross-sectional; Level IV.