Catheter-based renal denervation in the treatment of arterial hypertension: An expert consensus statement on behalf of the French Society of Hypertension (SFHTA), French Society of Radiology (SFR), French Society of Interventional Cardiology (GACI), French Society of Cardiology (SFC), French Association of Private Cardiologists (CNCF), French Association of Hospital Cardiologists (CNCH), French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SFCTCV) and French Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SCVE)

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Oct;117(10):601-611. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2024.05.122. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Abstract

Several high-quality, randomized, sham-controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency, ultrasound and alcohol catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for reducing blood pressure (BP). A French clinical consensus document has therefore been developed to propose guidance for the appropriate use of RDN in the management of hypertension along with a dedicated care pathway and management strategy. The French experts group concluded that RDN can serve as an adjunct therapy for patients with confirmed uncontrolled, resistant essential hypertension despite treatment with≥3 antihypertensive drugs, including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, a renin-angiotensin system blocker and a thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic at maximally tolerated doses. Patients should have (1) an estimated glomerular filtration rate of≥40mL/min/1.73m2; (2) an eligible renal artery anatomy on pre-RDN scans and (3) exclusion of secondary forms of hypertension. Additional indications might be considered for patients with difficult-to-control hypertension. Any indication of RDN should be validated by multidisciplinary hypertension teams consisting of both hypertension specialists and endovascular interventionalists in European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Excellence Centres or ESH-BP clinics. Patients should be informed about the benefit/risk ratio of RDN. Expertise in renal artery interventions and training in RDN techniques are needed for endovascular interventionalists conducting RDN procedures while centres offering RDN should have the necessary resources to manage potential complications effectively. Lastly, all patients undergoing RDN should have their data collected in a nationwide French registry to facilitate monitoring and evaluation of RDN outcomes, contributing to ongoing research and quality improvement efforts.

Keywords: Care pathway; Guidelines; Hypertension; Renal denervation.

Publication types

  • Practice Guideline

MeSH terms

  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Arterial Pressure
  • Catheter Ablation / adverse effects
  • Catheter Ablation / standards
  • Consensus*
  • Humans
  • Hypertension* / diagnosis
  • Hypertension* / physiopathology
  • Hypertension* / surgery
  • Hypertension* / therapy
  • Kidney* / blood supply
  • Kidney* / innervation
  • Renal Artery / diagnostic imaging
  • Renal Artery / innervation
  • Risk Factors
  • Sympathectomy* / adverse effects
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents