This study examines the strategic incorporation of various recycled materials into asphalt concrete, specifically focusing on municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash (MSWI BA), recycled asphalt shingle (RAS), and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA). Due to the high porosity of MSWI BA and RCA, and the significant asphalt binder content (30-40%) found in RAS, there is a need to increase the amount of liquid asphalt used. RAS is posited as an efficient substitute for the asphalt binder, helping to counterbalance the high absorption characteristics of MSWI BA and RCA. The research objective is to quantitatively evaluate the effect of the combined use of RAS, MSWI BA, and RCA in Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). This study encompasses several laboratory evaluations (i.e., rutting and tensile strength tests) and a cost-benefit analysis, which is a life cycle cost analysis. The results indicate that the combined use of these materials results in a higher tensile strength and rut resistance when compared with the control (with virgin aggregate). According to the cost-benefit analysis result, when the three recycled materials are used for an HMA overlay over an existing aged pavement, it could be 60-80% more cost-effective compared to a conventional HMA overlay, thereby offering significant economical savings each year in the field of road construction.
Keywords: life cycle cost analysis (LCCA); municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash (BA); recycled asphalt shingle (RAS); recycled concrete aggregate (RCA).