Introduction: The impact of combining ablation index (AI)-guided and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) ablation on procedural factors at the posterior wall near the esophagus is unclear.
Methods: Atrial fibrillation patients who underwent initial ablation using three-dimensional mapping were enrolled. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent only AI-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (AI group) and those who underwent vHPSD ablation at the posterior wall adjacent to the esophagus in addition to AI-guided PVI (AI + vHPSD group). Differences in myocardial injury, inflammation, procedural characteristics, and pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns were assessed between the two groups.
Results: This study included 167 patients (AI group, 83 patients; AI+vHPSD group, 84 patients). No significant differences in high-sensitive troponin I or changes in inflammatory markers between pre- and Postablation were observed in either group. Total application time and total application energy were significantly lower in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (p < 0.001 for both) despite no significant difference in the total number of applications between the groups. The incidence of esophagus temperature ≥40 degrees was significantly lower in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (p = 0.036). However, the incidence of PV reconnections near the esophagus was significantly higher in the AI+vHPSD group than in the AI group (11.9% vs 3.6%, p = 0.046), despite no significant difference in the incidence of PV reconnections overall.
Conclusion: The combination of AI-guided PVI and vHPSD adjacent to the esophagus demonstrated reduced application energy requirements and maintained safety and effectiveness during the perioperative period.
Keywords: ablation index guided ablation; atrial fibrillation; esophagus temperature; pulmonary vein reconnection; very high‐power short‐duration ablation.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.