Background: The identification of reliable prognostic biomarkers is crucial for optimizing cancer treatment strategies, especially in the era of personalized medicine. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in various cancer types, with a focus on its association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to 28 July 2024. We performed the meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method with a random effects model and reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The comprehensive literature search identified 10 studies comprising 2351 patients. Pooled analyses demonstrated that elevated pretreatment NER levels were significantly correlated with poorer OS (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.28-2.36, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.21-1.95, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed a consistent adverse association between high NER and OS across various tumor types and geographic locations, although results from studies conducted in the Far East did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that elevated NER is associated with poorer OS and PFS in cancer patients, suggesting its potential utility as a non-invasive prognostic marker. Further validation in large, prospective studies is warranted to establish NER's role in guiding personalized treatment strategies across diverse oncologic contexts.
Keywords: biomarker; meta-analysis; neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio; prognosis; survival.