Background: Recommendations for cardiac surgery advocate for antibiotic prophylaxis for up to 48 hour after surgery. However, recent reports found a significant reduction in surgical site infection with extended duration. We evaluated the effect of the type of prophylactic antibiotics and administration durations on the postoperative surgical site infection rate following cardiac surgery in adults.
Methods: An investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial was conducted from 2018 to 2022 on adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Patients were randomized into four groups based on antibiotic treatment type and duration: 24 h cefazolin, 24 h cefuroxime, 48 h cefazolin, and 48 h cefuroxime. The primary outcome was the rate of surgical site infections within 90 days of surgery.
Results: A total of 568 patients were included in this study. The four groups had similar baseline characteristics, including age, sex, EuroSCORE II, and baseline HbA1c. A total of 75 patients developed infection within 90 days postoperative. The overall infection rate was not statistically different across the four groups (p = 0.193). The efficacy of cefazolin and cefuroxime in reducing infection was comparable (p = 0.901). Extended prophylaxis was associated with a significantly reduced overall infection rate within 90 days postoperatively compared to 24-h prophylaxis (10.2% vs. 16.3%; risk ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-0.96, p = 0.032).
Conclusion: Using cefazolin or cefuroxime for 48 h instead of 24 h was more effective in reducing the overall surgical site infections rate up to 90 days after surgery.
Keywords: Prophylactic antibiotics; cardiac surgery; cefazolin; cefuroxime; surgical site infection.