Objective: To identify image biomarkers associated with overall life expectancy from low-dose computed tomography and integrate them as an index for assessing an individual's health.
Methods: Two categories of CT image features, body composition tissues and cardiopulmonary vasculature characteristics, were quantified from LDCT scans in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study cohort(n = 3,635). Cox proportional-hazards models identified significant image features which were integrated with subject demographics to predict the subject's overall hazard. Subjects were stratified using composite model predictions and feature-specific risk stratification thresholds. The model's performance was validated extensively, including 5-fold cross-validation on PLuSS baseline, PLuSS follow-up examinations, and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).
Results: The composite model had significantly improved prognostic ability compared to the baseline model (p < 0.01) with AUCs of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.757-0.792) on PLuSS, 0.723 (95% CI: 0.703-0.744) on PLuSS follow-up, and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.651-0.710) on the NLST cohort. The identified high-risk stratum were several times more likely to die, with mortality rates of 79.34% on PLuSS, 76.47% on PLuSS follow-up, and 46.74% on NLST. Two cardiopulmonary structures (intrapulmonary artery vein ratio, intrapulmonary vein density) and two body composition tissues (SM density, bone density) identified high-risk patients.
Conclusions: Body composition and pulmonary vasculatures are predictive of an individual's health risk; their integrations with subject demographics facilitate the assessment of an individual's overall health status or susceptibility to disease.
Advances in knowledge: CT-computed body composition and vasculature biomarkers provide improved prognostic value. The integration of CT biomarkers and patient demographic information improves subject risk stratification.
Keywords: image biomarker; life expectancy; low dose computed tomography; risk stratification.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.