Objectives: Children make up 5-10% of emergency medical services (EMS) transports and are at risk for under-recognition and under-treatment of pain. Prior studies have identified enablers to pediatric analgesia including EMS pediatric analgesia education, agency leadership support, the availability of assistive guides and having positive relationships with online medical control. Prior barriers identified were intravenous (IV) line insertion pain, caregiver concerns, difficulty assessing pain, pain medication safety concerns, unfamiliarity with pediatrics, unwanted attention from authority figures and perceived superiority of hospital care. This study's objective was to evaluate enablers and barriers to prehospital analgesia for children presenting with traumatic pain after the introduction of intranasal (IN) fentanyl into EMS protocols.
Methods: Focus groups with EMS clinicians were used to elicit perspectives on pediatric analgesia. EMS clinicians discussed transports of children in pain, decision-making regarding analgesic administration, available resources to treat pain including EMS protocols, patient and family reactions, and ways to improve pediatric oligoanalgesia. Themes were explored until thematic saturation was reached using a deductive approach with open-ended yet structured questions.
Results: Enablers for pediatric analgesia included longer transports, desire to stabilize the patient, vital signs or injuries suggestive of severe pain, and clinician comfort with and availability of IN pain medication. Barriers to analgesia included concerns that the child was not stable enough for pain medication, avoiding masking symptoms prior to hospital arrival, lack of pediatric experience, lack of access to opiates in some ambulances, poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access, patient refusal for an IV, caregivers' discomfort with opiates and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Focus group themes identified were that there was a lack of experience with pediatric patients, medical control was a helpful resource and training that approximated real-world situations was important.
Conclusions: New enablers for pediatric analgesia identified were longer transports and EMS clinician comfort with IN pain medications. While many barriers to pediatric analgesia persist, new barriers identified were poor suspension in ambulances causing difficulty with IV access and caregivers' lack of knowledge of available prehospital medications. Additional EMS pediatric training and experience may improve pediatric oligoanalgesia.
Keywords: analgesia; burn; children; fracture; pain.