Background: In this prospective cohort study the objective was to identify the socio-demographic and clinical factors that influence treatment response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at ambulatory multicenter rheumatology outpatient clinics. The subjects were patients with rheumatoid arthritis satisfying the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria with informed consent.
Materials and methods: Pre-coded data sheets were used to capture socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Baseline data was collected at time of patient recruitment. Only patients who had complete data at three-month follow-up were included in the study analysis. The study's outcome was achievement of remission or low disease activity. The study used the adherence in chronic disease scale and European Task Force for Patient Evaluation of General Practice tools to evaluate patient adherence and assessments of health care received. Data analysis was carried out using Prism 7 and SPSS. Categorical data were regulated as percentages, while continuous data were regulated as means and standard deviation. Prevalence (at 95% CIs) of various socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated comparisons of socio-demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics between patients into achieved primary/secondary outcomes and those who didn't were carried out using the chi-square statistic (for categorical variables) and independent student T-test (for continuous variables). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the impact of moderator variables on study outcomes and to calculate adjusted odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% CI. Throughout analysis α < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 206 patients were included. The mean age was 51.2 ± 15.1 years; mostly females (n=188 patients, 91.3%). Majority had attained post-primary education (n=172 patients, 83.5%). Only 74 patients (35.9%) had formal professional employment, while only six patients (3%) paid for healthcare via government-funded/private insurance. At recruitment, nearly half of the included patients had moderate to severe disability. Majority of patients had elevated baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Most of the patients (90.3%) had a positive rheumatoid factor test at recruitment, while 58% had a positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide test. Majority had moderate disease activity. Thirty-three patients were in remission, 9.7% had low disease activity while 12.6% had high disease activity. Majority of patients (94.2%) were on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, non-biological DMARDs (80.6%) and systemic corticosteroids (54.9%). Mean duration of follow-up was 4.6 months. At follow-up, 37.9% found the system to be acceptable, 63.6% found the system to be problematic. Majority of the patients reported to have been adherent to therapy (high adherence: 7.8%; moderate adherence: 86.9%). The proportion of patients who achieved remission or low disease activity increased significantly at three-month follow-up.
Conclusion: Having shorter disease duration, lower unemployment rates, higher income, lower non-adherence rates, having a positive outlook towards the healthcare system, normal CRP baseline, normal ESR baseline, and lower baseline of functional disability were significantly associated with increased chances of low disease activity/remission.
Keywords: disease activity score; health assessment questionnaire; low disease activity; remission; rheumatoid arthritis.
Copyright © 2024, Oyoo et al.