Objective: Identification of instrument failure (IF) represents a point to improve the quality of services provided by medical laboratories. Here, a logistic regression model was created to define the relationship between instrument downtime and laboratory quality management systems.
Methods: Interval-level quality control (QC) and categorical quality assurance data from 3 identical chemistry analyzers was utilized to generate a logistic regression model able to predict IF. A case-control approach and the forward stepwise likelihood-ratio method was used to develop the logistic regression model. The model was tested using a case-control dataset and again using the complete sample.
Results: A total of 650 downtime events were identified. A total of 22,880 QC data points, 187 calibrations, 24 proficiency testing events, and 107 maintenance records were analyzed. The regression model was able to correctly predict 59.2% of no instrument downtime events and 69.2% of instrument downtime events using the case-control data. Using the entire data set, the sensitivity of the model was 69.2% and the specificity was 58.2%.
Conclusion: A logistic regression model can predict instrument downtime nearly 70% of the time. This study acts as a proof of concept using a limited data set collected by the chemistry laboratory.
Keywords: clinical chemistry analyzer; instrument failure; instrument maintenance; logistic regression.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.