Accuracy and safety of implant placement with a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgical system: A translational research study

Fan Yang; Jianping Chen; Linhong Wang; Yude Ding

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.026

Accuracy and safety of implant placement with a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgical system: A translational research study

J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Nov 22:S0022-3913(24)00721-2. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.026. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Fan Yang¹, Jianping Chen², Linhong Wang³, Yude Ding⁴

Affiliations

¹ Professor, Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
² Attending, Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
³ Associate Professor, Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China.
⁴ Attending, Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China. Electronic address: dingyude@hmc.edu.cn.

PMID: 39580315
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.026

Abstract

Statement of problem: Translational studies evaluating the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of semi-autonomous implant robots, from model test to animal experiment and clinical trial, are currently lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and safety of a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgical system (sa-RASS) in implant placement.

Material and methods: A translational study was conducted to assess the application of the sa-RASS in a model test, an animal experiment, and a clinical controlled trial. The study included 45 resin models in the model test, 7 male beagle dogs in the animal experiment, and 60 participants who were recruited and randomly assigned to a freehand or a sa-RASS group in the clinical trial. The accuracy, surgical morbidity, complications, operator ratings of instrument safety, and satisfaction were recorded. Cone-beam computed tomography data were used to evaluate deviations between planned and placed implants. The data on deviations were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A linear regression model was established to analyze the variations in the deviations (α=.05).

Results: The mean ±standard deviation of the platform, apex, and angulation deviations were 0.98 ±0.53 mm, 1.10 ±0.52 mm, and 1.45 ±0.60 degrees in the model test and 0.58 ±0.19, 0.59 ±0.22 mm, and 1.88 ±0.71 degrees in the animal experiment. In the clinical controlled study, the platform, apex, and angular deviations of the sa-RASS group and freehand group were 0.93 ±0.50 mm versus 1.45 ±0.86 mm (P<.01), 1.07 ±0.63 mm versus 2.05 ±1.16 mm (P<.001), and 3.10 ±1.68 degrees versus 7.94 ±3.55 degrees (P<.001). No complications, such as early implant failure, intraoperative hemorrhage, injuries to adjacent structures, or implant displacement beyond the apical anatomic limit, were observed in the sa-RASS group. The results of the linear regression model showed that age, sex, bone density, implant position, implant diameter, and length did not significantly influence the accuracy of implantation at the apex or the angulation (P>.05).

Conclusions: The sa-RASS was found to be more accurate than freehand placement, with high operational safety and low surgical morbidity.