Background: The effects of factors related to anesthetic management, including anesthesia methods and infusion volume, on acute kidney injury (AKI) after esophagectomy have not been thoroughly investigated.
Methods: A historical cohort study of patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2008 and December 2022 was conducted. AKI was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine criteria within 72 h after esophagectomy. Logistic regression was used to model the association between perioperative factors, including factors related to anesthetic management, and postoperative AKI.
Results: Of 1005 patients, 48 patients (4.8%) had AKI (40 stage 1 and 8 stage 2). AKI patients were older (67.8 vs. 65.0 years, P = 0.046) and more likely to have hypertension (72.9 vs. 37.9%, P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (39.6 vs. 14.3%, P < 0.0001), red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (12.5 vs. 3.4%, P = 0.0085), and longer duration of anesthesia (518 vs. 490 min, P = 0.0058) than non-AKI patients. AKI patients were less likely to have epidural anesthesia (72.9 vs. 91.5%, P < 0.001). The distribution of inhaled anesthetics chosen was not significantly different between AKI and non-AKI patients. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, AKI was associated with the Brinkman index (per 100 units, odds ratio (OR) = 1.06), hypertension (OR = 3.39), chronic kidney disease (OR = 2.58), duration of anesthesia (per 10 min, OR = 1.03), epidural anesthesia (OR = 0.35) and RBC transfusion (OR = 3.27).
Conclusions: Except for epidural anesthesia, no significant association was found between AKI and factors related to anesthetic management. Epidural anesthesia may protect against early postoperative AKI in patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Keywords: Acute kidney injury; Epidural anesthesia; Esophageal cancer; Esophagectomy; Postoperative complication; Renal protection; Risk factors.
© 2024. The Author(s).