Fast MR imaging of the liver: quantitative comparison of techniques

Radiology. 1994 Oct;193(1):37-42. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090918.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare several techniques for fast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of focal liver lesions.

Materials and methods: Ninety patients (37 men and 53 women, aged 19-92 years [mean, 54 years]) with 137 focal liver lesions (56 metastases, 13 hepatocellular carcinomas, 52 hemangiomas, 16 cysts) underwent MR imaging with rapid acquisition spin-echo (RASE), T1-weighted fast low-angle shot (FLASH), turboFLASH, segmented turboFLASH, and T2-weighted conventional and turbo spin echo (SE). Images were analyzed for spleen-to-liver and lesion-to-liver signal difference-to-noise ratios (SD/Ns).

Results: Turbo SE T2-weighted imaging had the highest SD/N for spleen-to-liver (P < .01) and for lesion-to-liver (P < .02) contrast. Segmented T1-weighted turboFLASH imaging had the second highest SD/N for spleen-to-liver (P < .001) contrast and was better overall than other T1-weighted sequences for depicting liver lesions (P < .01). Results at segmented turboFLASH imaging were second best for hemangiomas (P < .01). For metastases, no significant difference was found for results with the T1-weighted sequences.

Conclusion: Segmented T1-weighted turboFLASH and turbo SE T2-weighted imaging hae advantages over conventional techniques for liver imaging.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / diagnosis
  • Cysts / diagnosis
  • Female
  • Hemangioma / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Liver / pathology*
  • Liver Diseases / diagnosis
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged