The effect of tunnelling on epidural catheter migration

Anaesthesia. 1996 Feb;51(2):191-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07714.x.

Abstract

A prospective, randomised study of 82 patients having postoperative epidural analgesia was performed to determine whether the tunnelling of an epidural catheter influences its migration. Tunnelling of the catheter subcutaneously for a distance of 5 cm reduced the incidence of inward migration of 1 cm or more (p < 0.01) compared to a standard method of fixation with a transparent adhesive dressing. This effect was more marked if the epidural catheter was sited in the thoracic rather than the lumbar area. Sixty two percent (n = 26) of tunnelled catheters remained within 0.5 cm of their original position compared to 38% (n = 16) of non-tunnelled catheters, although this difference was not statistically significant. Outward catheter migration was not reduced by subcutaneous tunnelling.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Analgesia, Epidural / methods*
  • Bandages
  • Catheterization, Peripheral / methods*
  • Female
  • Foreign-Body Migration / prevention & control*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pain, Postoperative / drug therapy*
  • Prospective Studies