Lung cancer, of which non-small cell carcinoma is the most common, has been a significant therapeutic challenge for decades and will remain so for decades to come. Despite its prevalence, progress in the management of non-small cell lung cancer has been relatively slow. This is in part due to the pessimism of most physicians treating this disease, which has resulted in a relatively lackadaisical attitude with regards to clinical trials when compared to other solid tumours like breast or colorectal cancers. Nevertheless, the past decade has seen significant progress, specifically with regards to the management of locally advanced disease. Chemotherapy, though shown to be biologically active in non-small cell lung cancer, is considered an ineffective palliative tool in the setting of metastatic disease due to its toxicities and the "less than encouraging" response rates generated by the cisplatin-based combination regimen which is generally considered to be the most active currently available. The advent of new active agents such as paclitaxel and vinorelbine which are potentially less toxic may change this view. Conversely, the response rate of locally advanced disease to chemotherapy is significantly higher and this has resulted in numerous multimodality trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery and/or radiation. To date, a number of randomised trials have shown that this approach can result in significant survival benefit for patients with locally advanced disease. An alternative approach makes use of the potential synergism between certain chemotherapeutic agents (such as cisplatin) and radiation when used concurrently. However, data on concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced disease have been largely based on single-arm studies and are inconclusive. Three randomised trials on concurrent chemoradiotherapy have been shown benefit for the use of combined modality in locally advanced disease. Hence, treatment of locally advanced disease should include chemotherapy as part of the combined modality approach. However, the optimal sequencing of these modalities would require well-designed randomised trials to determine.