Background: The prognostic importance of various clinical variables (age, sex, association with myasthenia gravis), staging according to Masaoka, histologic type according to the Marino/Kirchner/Müller-Hermelink (MKM-H) classification, and residual tumor category (R category) was evaluated in a retrospective analysis.
Methods: Eighty-two patients with epithelial thymic tumors (ETTs) treated in the period 1969-1993 were evaluated, and archived specimens were histologically reclassified according to the classification of MKM-H.
Results: Age, sex, and association with myasthenia gravis were of no prognostic importance. The R category is of significant prognostic importance, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 93.6% and 87.3%, respectively, for R0 resections compared with 0% at 5 years for R1 and R2 resections (p < 0.001). Staging (Masaoka) proved to be a prognostic factor (5-/10-year survival: stage I, 100%/90.9%; II, 95%/88.2%; III, 55.9%/46.6%; and IV, 10.8%/ 10.8%; p < 0.001). Histologic typing according to MKM-H is also of significant prognostic importance (5/10 year survival: thymomas: medullary, 100%/100%; mixed, 100%/100%, predominantly cortical, 68.6%/68.6%; cortical, 65.8%/65.8%; thymic carcinomas: well-differentiated type, 62.3%/44.5%; thymic carcinomas other than well-differentiated type, 33.6%/26.9%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that staging (p < 0.001), R category (p < 0.026), and MKM-H classification (p < 0.028) have an independent impact on survival.
Conclusions: Staging (Masaoka), R category, and histologic classification (MKM-H) are important independent prognostic factors for patients with epithelial thymic tumors. Complete (R0) surgical resections should be the ultimate goal in the clinical management of patients with epithelial thymic tumors.