Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. A randomized clinical trial

Surg Endosc. 1997 Apr;11(4):336-40. doi: 10.1007/s004649900358.

Abstract

Background: A randomized clinical trial was performed to compare open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).

Methods: 201 patients with similar characteristics of appendicitis were randomized to either OA or LA. Operative time and technique, reintroduction of diet, postoperative pain, use of analgesia, hospital stay, and complications were documented.

Results: 104 patients were allocated to the OA group and 97 to the LA group. Postoperative pain was significantly less in the LA group on the 1st (p < 0.001) and 2nd (p < 0.001) postoperative day, resulting in less use of analgesics on both days (p < 0.001). Restoration of diet was similar in both groups. Mean operative time was longer in the LA group: 61 vs 41 min (p < 0.001). Postoperative complications did not differ in either group, except for wound infections (six OA group vs zero LA group, p < 0.05). Mean hospital stay was similar in both groups.

Conclusions: LA results in less postoperative pain and fewer wound infections. The laparoscopic procedure is technically more demanding to perform, resulting in longer operative time.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Adult
  • Appendectomy / methods*
  • Appendicitis / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Pain, Postoperative / epidemiology
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Time Factors