Background: Advances in therapy and supportive care have improved the outlook for many patients with acute leukaemia, however elderly patients have increased treatment-related toxicity and shorter survival. Most clinical trials have selected patient populations with young median ages and it is therefore difficult to apply results to the general population where the majority of patients presenting with acute leukaemia are over 60 years. There is little information in the literature guiding appropriate treatment of these patients.
Aims: To determine the relationship between age, treatment received, and outcome in patients presenting with acute leukaemia.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients presenting to Prince Henry's Hospital and Monash Medical Centre with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL) during a five year period.
Results: Sixty-six patients (51-AML, 15-ALL) presented with acute leukaemia between March 1989 and April 1994. Median patient age was 63 years; 32% of patients received supportive therapy only; 86% of patients with ALL and 58% of patients with AML commencing remission-induction chemotherapy entered a complete remission. Median survival for patients receiving only supportive therapy was three months. Median survival in patients under 55 years was almost twice as long as patients over 55 years receiving similar treatment (AML-eight vs four months p = 0.023; ALL-3.5 vs seven months p = 0.029).
Conclusions: Median survival for acute leukaemia is inversely proportional to age. Applying results from selected series to elderly patients with acute leukaemia is inappropriate.