In 1988, Millward and Rivers reappraised existing metabolic models for amino acid requirements. The metabolic demand for amino acids was reviewed in relation to both obligatory metabolic consumption and adaptive pathways of amino acid oxidation. The obligatory demand pattern was deemed unknowable from first principles except that the level of one amino acid would be similar to its concentration in an amount of tissue protein equivalent to the obligatory nitrogen loss. The adaptive demand pattern was predicted to vary in relation to the amount and the periodicity of food protein intake that influenced the amplitude of the diurnal cycle of gains and losses. A regulatory influence of protein intake on anabolism, the anabolic drive, was identified in animal studies; benefit appeared to derive from intakes in excess of the minimum for balance, which could facilitate definition of an optimal requirement. The inherent and design-related limitations of both nitrogen and stable isotope balance studies of requirement were recognized as a major problem in identifying secure values for indispensable amino acid requirements. A decade of research of increasing methodological sophistication has generated much new information, confirming the adaptive diurnal model of balance regulation and allowing development of the anabolic drive into a general protein-stat theory for coordinated control of growth and maintenance of the lean body mass. However, notwithstanding several new estimates of amino acid requirement values, definition of a widely accepted human amino acid requirement pattern remains unresolved. Although a case can be made for an adjusted 1985 FAO adult requirement pattern being a reasonable estimate of the obligatory indispensable amino acid requirements for human maintenance, the problems posed by adaptation, methodological inadequacies and lack of independent measures of adequacy mean that assessment of the adequacy of the human diet to satisfy amino acid needs remains inherently difficult.