Frankel SD - Search Results

1

Thermoresponsive nanofabricated substratum for the engineering of three-dimensional tissues with layer-by-layer architectural control.

Jiao A, Trosper NE, Yang HS, Kim J, Tsui JH, Frankel SD, Murry CE, Kim DH. Jiao A, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. ACS Nano. 2014 May 27;8(5):4430-9. doi: 10.1021/nn4063962. Epub 2014 Apr 24. ACS Nano. 2014. PMID: 24628277 Free PMC article.

2

Spatiotemporal control of cardiac anisotropy using dynamic nanotopographic cues.

Mengsteab PY, Uto K, Smith AS, Frankel S, Fisher E, Nawas Z, Macadangdang J, Ebara M, Kim DH. Mengsteab PY, et al. Biomaterials. 2016 Apr;86:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.062. Epub 2016 Feb 4. Biomaterials. 2016. PMID: 26874887 Free PMC article.

3

Periostin is a novel therapeutic target that predicts and regulates glioma malignancy.

Mikheev AM, Mikheeva SA, Trister AD, Tokita MJ, Emerson SN, Parada CA, Born DE, Carnemolla B, Frankel S, Kim DH, Oxford RG, Kosai Y, Tozer-Fink KR, Manning TC, Silber JR, Rostomily RC. Mikheev AM, et al. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Mar;17(3):372-82. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou161. Epub 2014 Aug 19. Neuro Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25140038 Free PMC article.

4

Control of the interface between heterotypic cell populations reveals the mechanism of intercellular transfer of signaling proteins.

Kshitiz, Afzal J, Suhail Y, Ahn EH, Goyal R, Hubbi ME, Hussaini Q, Ellison DD, Goyal J, Nacev B, Kim DH, Lee JH, Frankel S, Gray K, Bankoti R, Chien AJ, Levchenko A. Kshitiz, et al. Integr Biol (Camb). 2015 Mar;7(3):364-72. doi: 10.1039/c4ib00209a. Integr Biol (Camb). 2015. PMID: 25784457 Free PMC article.

5

Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance.

Frankel SD, Sickles EA, Curpen BN, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB. Frankel SD, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 May;164(5):1107-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717214. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995. PMID: 7717214

6

Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Esserman L, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):110-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.110. J Clin Oncol. 1999. PMID: 10458224

7

Clinical efficacy of mammographic screening in the elderly.

Faulk RM, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD. Faulk RM, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. Radiology. 1995 Jan;194(1):193-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997552. Radiology. 1995. PMID: 7997552

8

Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel SD, Ominsky SH, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Kerlikowske K, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Dec 2;90(23):1801-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.23.1801. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998. PMID: 9839520

9

Efficacy of step-oblique mammography for confirmation and localization of densities seen on only one standard mammographic view.

Pearson KL, Sickles EA, Frankel SD, Leung JW. Pearson KL, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Mar;174(3):745-52. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740745. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000. PMID: 10701619

10

The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.

Curpen BN, Sickles EA, Sollitto RA, Ominsky SH, Galvin HB, Frankel SD. Curpen BN, et al. Among authors: frankel sd. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 May;164(5):1099-103. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717212. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995. PMID: 7717212

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

20 results

Search Page

Filters